NRS439 Week 5 Research Reading Literature

The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis. Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and 8) CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and 8) Points:This assignment isworth 225 points. Due Date:Submit to the Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Requirements 1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library. Retrieve the following research articles:Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions. George, S., & Thomas, S. (2010). Lived experience of diabetes among older, rural people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1092-1100. .ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live”>http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live Hunt, C., Sanderson, B., Ellison, K., (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-management. MedSurg Nursing,23(4), 231-237. .chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2012695204&site=eds-live”>http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2012695204&site=eds-live 2. Download NR439_RRL_form and type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your paper does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences. 3. Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_RRL_Smith.docx. 4. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment. The link may be found on the Week 5 Assignments page. 5. Submit to the Week 5 Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Please post questions about this paper in the Week 5 Q & A Forum. Grading Criteria Category Points % Description Question 1 10 4% Identifies the purpose of the research article. Question 2 10 4% Identifies the research question implied in the study. Question 3 10 4% Describes the research design of the study. Question 4 10 4% Identifies and describes the population. Question 5 10 4% Was the sample adequate for the research design Question 6 10 4% Describe the data collection procedure Question 7 10 4% How were the data analyzed Question 8 10 4% Describes the limitations in the study. Question 9 10 4% Describes the authors’ conclusions. Question 10 10 5% How does this advance knowledge in the field. Question 11 10 5% Identifies the purpose of the research article. Question 12 10 5% Identifies the research question implied in the study. Question 13 10 5% Describes the research design of the study. Question 14 10 5% Identifies characteristics of quantitative study. Question 15 10 5% Was the sample adequate for the research design Question 16 10 5% Describe the data collection procedure Question 17 10 5% How were the data analyzed Question 18 10 5% Describes the limitations in the study. Question 19 10 5% Describes the authors’ conclusions. Question 20 10 5% How does this advance knowledge in the field. Style and Writing 25 11% Names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. Total 225 points 100% Grading Rubric Assignment Criteria A (92-100%) Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance B (84-91%) Very Good or High Level of Performance C 76-83%) Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance F 0-75%) Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Pts Question 1 Purpose (10 points) Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article. 9–10 points Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article. 8 points Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article. 7 points Does not answer the question or provides an incorrect answer. 0–6 points /10 Question 2 Research question (10 points) Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given. 9–10 points Mostly identifies the research question that the author described. 8 points Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described. 7 points Does not answer or fails to identify the research question that the author described. 0–6 points /10 Question 3 Research design (10 points) Correctly describes the research design of the study 9–10 points Mostly describes the research design of the study. 8 points Somewhat describes the research design of the study. 7 points Does not describe the design of the study, or inaccurately identifies it. 0–6 points /10 Question 4 Population (10 points) Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 9–10 points Mostly describesidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 8 points Somewhatidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 7 points Does notidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 0–6 points /10 Question 5 Sample (10 points) Correctly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied. 9–10 points Mostly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied 8 points Somewhat describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied 7 points Doesn’t answer the question, or misunderstands if the sample was adequate for the research design studied. 0–6 points /10 Question 6 Data collection (10 points) Correctly describes the data collection procedure. 9–10 points Mostly describes the data collection procedure. 8 points Somewhat describes the data collection procedure. 7 points Doesn’t answer the question, or misunderstands the data collection procedure. 0–6 points /10 Question 7 Data analysis (10 points) Correctly describes how the data was analyzed. 9–10 points Partially describes how the data was analyzed. 8 points Minimally describes how the data was analyzed. 7 points Incorrectly describes how the data was analyzed or fails to answer 0–6 points /10 Question 8 Limitations (10 points) Correctlydescribes the limitations in the study. 9–10 points Mostlydescribes the limitations in the study 8 points Somewhat describes the limitations in the study. 7 points Incorrectly describes the limitations in the study or does not answer 0–6 points /10 Question 9 Conclusions (10 points) Correctly describes the authors’ conclusions 9–10 points Mostly describes the authors’ conclusions 8 points Somewhat describes the authors’ conclusions 7 points Incorrectlydescribes the authors’ conclusions or does not answer question 0–6 points /10 Question 10 Advances knowledge (10 points) Correctly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 9–10 points Mostly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 8 points Somewhat describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 7 points Incorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in the field or does not anwer the question. 0–6 points /10 Question 11 Purpose (10 points) Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article. 9–10 points Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article. 8 points Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article. 7 points Does not answer the question or provides an incorrect answer. 0–6 points /10 Question 12 Research question (10 points) Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given. 9–10 points Mostly identifies the research question that the author described. 8 points Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described. 7 points Does not answer or fails to identify the research question that the author described. 0–6 points /10 Question 13 Research design (10 points) Correctly describes the research design of the study 9–10 points Mostly describes the research design of the study. 8 points Somewhat describes the research design of the study. 7 points Does not describe the design of the study, or inaccurately identifies it. 0–6 points /10 Question 14 Population (10 points) Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 9–10 points Mostly describesidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 8 points Somewhatidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 7 points Does notidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 0–6 points /10 Question 15 Sample (10 points) Correctly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied. 9–10 points Mostly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied 8 points Somewhat describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied 7 points Doesn’t answer the question, or misunderstands if the sample was adequate for the research design studied. 0–6 points /10 Question 16 Data collection (10 points) Correctly describes the data collection procedure. 9–10 points Mostly describes the data collection procedure. 8 points Somewhat describes the data collection procedure. 7 points Doesn’t answer the question, or misunderstands the data collection procedure. 0–6 points /10 Question 17 Data Analysis (10 points) Correctly describes how the data was analyzed. 9–10 points Partially describes how the data was analyzed. 8 points Minimally describes how the data was analyzed. 7 points Incorrectly describes how the data was analyzed or fails to answer 0–6 points /10 Question 18 Limitations (10 points) Correctlydescribes the limitations in the study. 9–10 points Mostlydescribes the limitations in the study 8 points Somewhat describes the limitations in the study. 7 points Incorrectly describes the limitations in the study or does not answer 0–6 points /10 Question 19 Conclusions (10 points) Correctly describes the authors’ conclusions 9–10 points Mostly describes the authors’ conclusions 8 points Somewhat describes the authors’ conclusions 7 points Incorrectlydescribes the authors’ conclusions or does not answer question 0–6 points /10 Question 20 Advances knowledge (10 points) Correctly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 9–10 points Mostly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 8 points Somewhat describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 7 points Incorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in the field or does not anwer the question. 0–6 points /10 Style and Writing (25 pts) Correctly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. 23–25 points One to two errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. 21–22 points Three to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax 19–20 points Five or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. 0–18 points /25 Total Points = ____/225 Reading Research Literature – Week 5 Type your answers to the following questions using complete sentences and correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Click Save as and save the file with your last name and assignment, e.g.,NR439_RRL_Smith. Submit to the Week 5 RRL basket in the Dropbox by11:59 pm MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. The guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment may be found in Doc Sharing. Title: RRL Name: [replace this text with your name] The following questions pertain to: George, S., & Thomas, S. (2010). Lived experience of diabetes among older, rural people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1092-1100. .ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live”>http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live 1) What is the purpose of this research? 2) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit. 3) Did the authors describe the research design of this study? If so, give a description. 4) Describe the population (sample) for this study. 5) Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected? 6) Describe the data collection procedure. 7) How were the data analyzed after collection? 8) Discuss the limitations found in the study. 9) Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected? 10)How does this advance knowledge in the field? The following questions pertain to: Hunt, C., Sanderson, B., Ellison, K., (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-management. MedSurg Nursing,23(4), 231-237. .devry.edu/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00008484-201407000-00008&D=ovft&PDF=y”>http://proxy.devry.edu/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00008484-201407000-00008&D=ovft&PDF=y 11)What is the purpose of this research? 12)What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit. 13) Did the authors describe the research design of this study? If so, give a description. 14)Describe the population (sample) for this study. 15)Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected? 16) Describe the data collection procedure. 17)How were the data analyzed? 18)Discuss the limitations found in the study? 19)Discuss the authors’ conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected? 20)How does this advance knowledge in the field.

NRS439 Week 5 Research Reading Literature

BEST-ESSAY-WRITERS-ONLINE

ORDER A SIMILAR ESSAY WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH at : https://www.nursingessayhub.com/

PLACE YOUR ORDER